Return-Path: Received: from vps2554416.cdpk.io by vps2554416.cdpk.io with LMTP id qCDdGPzexWfcJBYAObWN/g (envelope-from ); Mon, 03 Mar 2025 10:55:24 -0600 Return-path: Envelope-to: dif@xicotepecpuebla.gob.mx, juridico-dif@xicotepecpuebla.gob.mx Delivery-date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 10:55:24 -0600 Received: from pmg2.serverneubox.com.mx ([198.59.144.253]:42224) by vps2554416.cdpk.io with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.1) (envelope-from ) id 1tp94d-000000065Vr-1PiT; Mon, 03 Mar 2025 10:55:24 -0600 Received: from pmg2.serverneubox.com.mx (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.serverneubox.com.mx (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C010FA498C; Mon, 3 Mar 2025 10:54:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from v267988.vpsmx.net (v267988.vpsmx.net [65.99.252.29]) by pmg2.serverneubox.com.mx (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 647FCA48E4; Mon, 3 Mar 2025 10:54:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48828 helo=v267988.vpsmx.net) by v267988.vpsmx.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tp93b-00044e-0N; Mon, 03 Mar 2025 10:54:19 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 10:54:18 -0600 From: defensa.infanciayfamilia.pue@sedif.gob.mx To: dif@xicotepecpuebla.gob.mx Cc: juridico-dif@xicotepecpuebla.gob.mx Subject: Re: EL QUE SE INDICA In-Reply-To: <6f331abb706c861bc271866c542c049b@xicotepecpuebla.gob.mx> References: <61373d0b8c8dccc669ad6b470d7dceb4@sedif.gob.mx> <6f331abb706c861bc271866c542c049b@xicotepecpuebla.gob.mx> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.6.9 Message-ID: <427a938334d00810f58eacfa5e2a68ce@sedif.gob.mx> X-Sender: defensa.infanciayfamilia.pue@sedif.gob.mx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 X-Spam-Score: 5 X-Spam-Bar: / X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "vps2554416.cdpk.io", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. Content preview: El 2025-02-25 15:47, dif@xicotepecpuebla.gob.mx escribió: > Envió oficio de contestación respecto de la visita domiciliaria > realizada el 25 de febrero del al año en sita esto para los efectos qu [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [198.59.144.253 listed in sa-trusted.bondedsender.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [198.59.144.253 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [198.59.144.253 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment 0.5 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals X-Spam-Flag: NO El 2025-02-25 15:47, dif@xicotepecpuebla.gob.mx escribió: > Envió oficio de contestación respecto de la visita domiciliaria > realizada el 25 de febrero del al año en sita esto para los efectos que > haya lugar, finalmente le solcito de la manera más atenta me acuse de > recibido. BUEN DÍA, ACUSO DE RECIBIDO